Mechanical power in mechanical ventilation: Physiologic basis, evidence, and clinical implications

Shunsuke Kondo, Austin Corpuz, Collin Clarke, Scott Nishioka, Shun Nakahara, Ehab G Daoud, Brent Matsuda

Cite

Kondo S, Corpuz A, Clarke C, Nishioka S, Nakahara S, Daoud EG, Matsuda B. Mechanical power in mechanical ventilation: Physiologic basis, evidence, and clinical implications. J Mech Vent 2026; 7(1):1-15.

Metrics

26 Downloads

Abstract

Invasive mechanical ventilation is a cornerstone of supportive care for patients with acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), yet ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Conventional lung-protective strategies have focused on limiting individual ventilatory variables such as tidal volume, driving pressure, and plateau pressure, but these parameters incompletely capture the cumulative mechanical burden imposed on the lung. Mechanical power has emerged as an integrative concept that quantifies the total energy transferred from the ventilator to the respiratory system per unit time, incorporating tidal volume, airway pressures, inspiratory flow, respiratory rate, and positive end-expiratory pressure.

This narrative review summarizes the physiologic basis of mechanical power, methods for bedside calculation, and current experimental and clinical evidence linking mechanical power to lung injury and patient outcomes. Preclinical studies consistently demonstrate that increasing mechanical power exacerbates structural lung damage and inflammation, even when individual ventilatory variables remain within conventionally accepted ranges. Observational clinical studies across diverse populations including ARDS, acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, and general ICU cohorts have shown robust associations between higher mechanical power and increased mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and longer ICU stay. Reported risk ranges commonly fall between 14 and 18 J/min, although no universal safe threshold has been established.

Important limitations remain. Mechanical power is typically calculated at the level of the respiratory system and does not fully account for heterogeneity in lung size, regional stress distribution, or the fraction of energy dissipated within vulnerable lung units. Normalization to predicted body weight, respiratory system compliance, or aerated lung volume appears to improve prognostic discrimination, supporting a personalized interpretation aligned with the “baby lung” concept. Moreover, emerging data suggest that time-varying and cumulative exposure to high mechanical power may be more relevant than single time-point measurements.

In conclusion, mechanical power provides a coherent, energy-based framework for interpreting ventilatory intensity and VILI risk. At present, it should be viewed as a complementary biomarker rather than a validated therapeutic target. Future research should focus on injury-relevant energy metrics, optimal normalization strategies, and randomized trials testing protocolized mechanical power–guided ventilation strategies.

Keywords: Mechanical power, VILI, ARDS

References

1. Paudel R, Trinkle CA, Waters CM, et al. Mechanical power: A New Concept in Mechanical Ventilation. Am J Méd Sci 2021;362(6):537-545.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2021.09.004
PMid:34597688 PMCid:PMC8688297
2. Düring S von, Liu K, Munshi L, et al. The association between mechanical power within the first 24 hours and icu mortality in mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A registry-based cohort study. Chest 2025;168(4):901-911.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.012
PMid:40158848 PMCid:PMC12597590
3. Network ARDS, Brower RG, Matthay MA, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(18):1301-1308.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200005043421801
PMid:10793162 PMCid:PMC10264327
4. Marini JJ, Rocco PRM, Gattinoni L. Static and dynamic contributors to ventilator-induced lung injury in clinical practice. Pressure, energy, and power. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 201(7):767-774.
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201908-1545CI
PMid:31665612 PMCid:PMC7124710
5. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 2013; 369(22):2126-2136.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1208707
PMid:24283226 PMCid:PMC10264327
6. Tremblay LN, Slutsky AS. Ventilator-induced injury: from barotrauma to biotrauma. Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1998; 110(6):482-488.
7. Gattinoni L, Collino F, Camporota L. Mechanical power: meaning, uses and limitations. Intensiv Care Med 2023; 49(4):465-467.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-06991-3
PMid:36884050 PMCid:PMC10119242
8. Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, et al. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensiv Care Med 2016; 42(10):1567-1575.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2
PMid:27620287
9. Urbankowski T, Pasledni R, Darowski M. Mechanical power in mechanical ventilation and its association with ventilator-induced lung injury: A systematic review. Respir Med 2025; 250:108525.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108525
PMid:41270941
10. Cressoni M, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, et al. Mechanical power and development of ventilator-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology 2016; 124(5):1100-1108.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001056
PMid:26872367 PMCid:PMC10264327
11. Neto AS, Deliberato RO, Johnson AEW, et al. Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: an analysis of patients in two observational cohorts. Intensive Care Medicine 2018; 44(11):1914-1922.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5375-6
PMid:30291378
12. Goedegebuur J, Smits FE, Snoep JWM, et al. Mechanical power is associated with mortality in pressure-controlled ventilated patients: A Dutch, single-center cohort study. Crit Care Explor 2024;6(12):e1190.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001190
PMid:39699550 PMCid:PMC11661764
13. Manrique S, Ruiz-Botella M, Murillo N, et al. Impact of mechanical power on ICU mortality in ventilated critically ill patients: a retrospective study with continuous real-life data. Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):491.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-024-02082-1
PMid:39375738 PMCid:PMC11457382
14. Coppola S, Caccioppola A, Froio S, et al. Effect of mechanical power on intensive care mortality in ARDS patients. Critical Care 2020; 24(1):246.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02963-x
PMid:32448389 PMCid:PMC7245621
15. Urner M, Jüni P, Hansen B, et al. Time-varying intensity of mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure: a registry-based, prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8(9):905-913.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30325-8
PMid:32735841 PMCid:PMC7906666
16. Costa ELV, Slutsky AS, Brochard LJ, et al. Ventilatory variables and mechanical power in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021; 204(3):303-311.
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202009-3467OC
PMid:33784486
17. Silva PL, Ball L, Rocco PRM, et al. Power to mechanical power to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury? Intensiv Care Med Exp 2019; 7(Suppl 1):38.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0243-4
PMid:31346828 PMCid:PMC6658623
18. Talmor D, Sarge T, O’Donnell CR, et al. Esophageal and transpulmonary pressures in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2006; 34(5):1389-1394.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000215515.49001.A2
PMid:16540960 PMCid:PMC2278169
19. Staay M van der, Chatburn RL. Advanced modes of mechanical ventilation and optimal targeting schemes. Intensiv Care Med Exp 2018; 6(1):30.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0195-0
PMid:30136011 PMCid:PMC6104409
20. Keitoku K, Yeo J, Cabbat R, Daoud EG. Mechanical power and Power Compliance Index in independent lung ventilation. New insight. J Mech Vent 2022; 3(2):124-131.
https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10057
21. Grieco DL, Chen L, Brochard L. Transpulmonary pressure: importance and limits. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5(14):285-285.
https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.07.22
PMid:28828360 PMCid:PMC5537111
22. Loring SH, O’Donnell CR, Behazin N, et al. Esophageal pressures in acute lung injury: do they represent artifact or useful information about transpulmonary pressure, chest wall mechanics, and lung stress? J Appl Physiol 2010; 108(3):515-522.
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00835.2009
PMid:20019160 PMCid:PMC2838644
23. Gattinoni L, Pesenti A. The concept of “baby lung.” Intensive Care Med 2005; 31(6):776-784.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2627-z
PMid:15812622
24. Bates JHT, Kaczka DW, Kollisch-Singule M, et al. Mechanical power and ventilator-induced lung injury: What does physics have to say? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2024; 209(7):787-788.
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202307-1292VP
PMid:37729623 PMCid:PMC10995572
25. Busana M, Zinnato C, Romitti F, et al. Energy dissipation during expiration and ventilator-induced lung injury: an experimental animal study. J Appl Physiol 2022; 133(5):1212-1219.
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00426.2022
PMid:36173324
26. Becher T, Staay M van der, Schädler D, et al. Calculation of mechanical power for pressure-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45(9):1321-1323.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05636-8
PMid:31101961
27. Giosa L, Busana M, Pasticci I, et al. Mechanical power at a glance: a simple surrogate for volume-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med Exp 2019; 7(1):61.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0276-8
PMid:31773328 PMCid:PMC6879677
28. Chiumello D, Gotti M, Guanziroli M, et al. Bedside calculation of mechanical power during volume- and pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2020; 24(1):417.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03116-w
PMid:32653011 PMCid:PMC7351639
29. Lee P, Morikawa K, Daoud E. Evaluation of the mean airway pressure – Minute ventilation (mM) Equation for mechanical power during spontaneous breathing. J Mech Vent 2025; 6(2):72-78.
https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10125
30. Daoud E, Lee P, Toma S, Franck C. Mean airway pressure – Minute ventilation product (mM): A simple and universal surrogate equation to calculate mechanical power in both volume and pressure controlled ventilation. J Mech Vent 2024; 5(2):46-55.
https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10099
31. Chiumello D, Coppola S, Formenti P, et al. A validation study of a continuous automatic measurement of the mechanical power in ARDS patients. J Crit Care 2022; 67:21-25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.09.009
PMid:34624699
32. Amato MBP, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(8):747-755.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1410639
PMid:25693014
33. Santini A, Mauri T, Corte FD, et al. Effects of inspiratory flow on lung stress, pendelluft, and ventilation heterogeneity in ARDS: a physiological study. Crit Care 2019; 23(1):369.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2641-0
PMid:31752952 PMCid:PMC6873770
34. Huhle R, Neto A, Schultz M, et al. Is mechanical power the final word on ventilator-induced lung injury? No. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6(19):394.
https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.09.65
PMid:30460268 PMCid:PMC6212365
35. Silva AL da, Magalhaes RF, Conceicao PHL, et al. Effects of similar mechanical power resulting from different combinations of respiratory variables on lung damage in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2025; 53(6):e1303-e1313.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006661
PMid:40167363
36. Tonetti T, Vasques F, Rapetti F, et al. Driving pressure and mechanical power: new targets for VILI prevention. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5(14):286-286.
https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.07.08
PMid:28828361 PMCid:PMC5537108
37. Xie Y, Zheng H, Mou Z, et al. High expression of CXCL10/CXCR3 in ventilator‐induced lung injury caused by high mechanical power. BioMed Res Int 2022; 2022(1):6803154.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6803154
PMid:35036436 PMCid:PMC8759875
38. Scharffenberg M, Wittenstein J, Ran X, et al. Mechanical power correlates with lung inflammation assessed by positron-emission tomography in experimental acute lung injury in pigs. Front Physiol 2021; 12:717266.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.717266
PMid:34880770 PMCid:PMC8645956
39. Li HH, Wang CW, Chang CH, et al. Relationship between mechanical ventilation and histological fibrosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing open lung biopsy. J Pers Med. 2022; 12(3):474.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030474
PMid:35330473 PMCid:PMC8954834
40. Collino F, Rapetti F, Vasques F, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure and mechanical power. Anesthesiology 2019; 130(1):119-130.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002458
41. Romitti F, Busana M, Palumbo MM, et al. Mechanical power thresholds during mechanical ventilation: An experimental study. Physiol Rep 2022; 10(6):e15225.
https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15225
PMid:35340133 PMCid:PMC8957661
42. Meenen DMP van, Algera AG, Schuijt MTU, et al. Effect of mechanical power on mortality in invasively ventilated ICU patients without the acute respiratory distress syndrome: An analysis of three randomized clinical trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2023; 40(1):21-28.
https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001778
PMid:36398740
43. Zhang Z, Zheng B, Liu N, et al. Mechanical power normalized to predicted body weight as a predictor of mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45(6):856-864.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05627-9
PMid:31062050
44. Khorasanee R, Sanderson B, Tomarchio E, et al. Mechanical power normalisation methods to predict ICU mortality: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intensiv Care 2025;15(1):149.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01562-9
PMid:41023443 PMCid:PMC12480304
45. Hu W, Zhang S, He Z, et al. Impact of time-varying intensity of mechanical ventilation on 28-day mortality depends on fluid balance in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study. Front Med 2022; 9:906903.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.906903
PMid:35966840 PMCid:PMC9366012
46. Schuijt MTU, Meenen DMP van, Martin-Loeches I, et al. Association of time-varying intensity of ventilation with mortality in patients with COVID−19 ARDS: Secondary analysis of the PRoVENT-COVID study. Front Med 2021; 8:725265.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.725265
PMid:34869421 PMCid:PMC8637438
47. Caironi P, Carlesso E, Cressoni M, et al. Lung recruitability is better estimated according to the berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome at standard 5 cmH2o rather than higher positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 2015; 43(4):781-790.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000770
PMid:25513785
48. Pistillo N, Castelluccio P, Suzuki I, et al. Mechanical power correlates with stress, strain, and atelectrauma only when normalized to aerated lung size in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Explor 2023;5(10):e0982.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000982
PMid:37753234 PMCid:PMC10519489
49. Galizia M, Ghidoni V, Catozzi G, et al. Predictors of VILI risk: driving pressure, 4DPRR and mechanical power ratio-an experimental study. Intensiv Care Med Exp 2024;12(1):116.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00697-6
PMid:39661304 PMCid:PMC11635077
50. Williams EC, Motta-Ribeiro GC, Melo MFV. Driving pressure and transpulmonary pressure. Anesthesiology 2019; 131(1):155-163.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002731
PMid:31094753 PMCid:PMC6639048
51. Arnal JM, Saoli M, Garnero A. Airway and transpulmonary driving pressures and mechanical powers selected by INTELLiVENT-ASV in passive, mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Heart Lung 2020; 49(4):427-434.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.11.001
PMid:31733881
52. Fajardo-Campoverdi A, Mamani-Cruz L, Ibarra-Estrada M, et al. Cyclic energy: the transcendental relevance of respiratory rate. A retrospective observational study with Bayesian analysis. J Mech Vent 2024; 5(1):1-10.
https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10093
53. Hickling KG, Walsh J, Henderson S, et al. Low mortality rate in adult respiratory distress syndrome using low-volume, pressure-limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia: A prospective study. Crit Care Med 1994; 22(10):1568-1578.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199422100-00011
PMid:7924367
54. Jimenez JV, Munroe E, Weirauch AJ, et al. Electric impedance tomography-guided PEEP titration reduces mechanical power in ARDS: a randomized crossover pilot trial. Crit Care 2023; 27(1):21.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04315-x
PMid:36650593 PMCid:PMC9843117
55. Buiteman-Kruizinga LA, Mkadmi HE, Schultz MJ, et al. Comparison of mechanical power during adaptive support ventilation versus nonautomated pressure-controlled ventilation-a pilot study. Crit Care Explor 2021; 3(2):e0335.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000335
PMid:33604578 PMCid:PMC7886404
56. Takaoka K, Toma S, Lee P, et al. A comparative analysis of mechanical power and Its components in pressure-controlled ventilation mode and AVM-2 mode. J Mech Vent 2023; 4(4):130-140.
https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10088
57. Wu SH, Kor CT, Mao IC, et al. Accuracy of calculating mechanical power of ventilation by one commonly used equation. J Clin Monit Comput 2022; 36(6):1753-1759.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00823-3
PMid:35426575 PMCid:PMC9637605
58. Daoud E, Franck C. Alveolar mechanics: A new concept in respiratory monitoring. J Mech Vent 2022; 3(4):178-188.
https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10065
59. Marini JJ, Crooke PS, Rocco PRM. Mechanical power of ventilation: tracking the damaging component. Crit Care 2026; 30(1):29.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05679-y
PMid:41545894 PMCid:PMC12809898
60. Fajardo-Campoverdi A, González-Castro A, Alapont VM i, et al. Elastic static power, its correlation with acute respiratory distress syndrome severity: A Bayesian post-hoc analysis of the Mechanical Power Day cross-sectional trial. Med Intensiva 2025; 49(5):502128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2024.502128
PMid:39741096