Flow beyond intended expiratory flow termination: Why inspiratory pressure rise time should be integrated into Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) recommendations

Benjamin Neetz, Mascha O Fiedler-Kalenka, Markus A Weigand, Patrick Rehn

DOI

https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV10161

Error! This download item is not available! It may be unpublished, private, or you may not have permission to view it.

Cite

Neetz B, Fiedler-Kalenka MO, Weigand MA, Rehn P.  Letter to the Editor:  Flow beyond intended expiratory flow termination: Why inspiratory pressure rise time should be integrated into Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) recommendations. J Mech Vent 2026; 7(3):157-158.

Metrics

0 Downloads

Abstract

This letter highlights the role of the inspiratory rise time (IPRT) within the Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation (TCAV) protocol. While current guidelines emphasize adjusting TLow to terminate expiratory flow at approximately 75% of the peak expiratory flow rate to prevent alveolar instability and atelectrauma, the potential impact of IPRT on these flow kinetics has been largely unrecognized. Our prospective data suggest that increasing the IPRT can prolong the release phase, which may be associated with a reduction in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi), alongside a potential increase in driving pressure and tidal volume. Notably, conventional assessment methods, such as the expiratory hold maneuver, may fail to detect these alterations, which could limit the reliability of standard clinical monitoring in this context. To safeguard EELV and optimize the protective nature of this strategy, we suggest that future clinical investigations evaluate whether managing IPRT as a protocol consideration can further refine the safety and consistency of the TCAV protocol.

Keywords: Inspiratory pressure rise time, APRV, TCAV

References

1. Nieman GF, Bates JHT, Andrews PL, et al. Expert recommendations for setting and adjusting airway pressure release ventilation based on clinical experience and basic science evidence. Front Med (Lausanne) 2026; 13:1741129.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1741129
PMid:41709908
2. Kollisch-Singule M, Emr B, Smith B,. Mechanical breath profile of airway pressure release ventilation: the effect on alveolar recruitment and microstrain in acute lung injury. JAMA Surg 2014; 149(11):1138-1145.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1829
PMid:25230047
3. Kollisch-Singule M, Jain S, Andrews P, et al. Effect of Airway pressure release ventilation on dynamic alveolar heterogeneity. JAMA Surg 2016; 151(1):64-72.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2683
PMid:26444302
4. Ibarra-Estrada MÁ, García-Salas Y, Mireles-Cabodevila E, et al. Use of airway pressure release ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: Results of a single-center randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2022; 50(4):586-594.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005312
PMid:34593706 PMCid:PMC8923279
5. Habashi NM, Andrews P, Kollisch-Singule Met al. A ventilator mode cannot set itself, nor can it be solely responsible for outcomes. Crit Care Med 2022; 50(4):695-699.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005403
PMid:35311779
6. Neetz B, Rehn P, Kraus N, et al. Impact of inspiratory pressure rise time on lung-emptying in time controlled adaptive ventilation. Respir Care 2025; 70(12):1547-1555.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19433654251359959
PMid:40853279
7. Rola P, Daxon B. Airway pressure release ventilation with time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV™) in COVID-19: A community hospital’s experience. Front Physiol 2022; 13:787231.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.787231
PMid:35480043 PMCid:PMC9037240