Evaluation of the mean airway pressure – Minute ventilation (mM) equation in Spontaneous breathing and its effects on mechanical power  

Philip M Lee, Kira Morikawa, Ehab G Daoud

Cite

Lee PM, Morikawa K, Daoud EG. Evaluation of the mean airway pressure – minute ventilation (mM) equation in Spontaneous breathing and its effects on mechanical power. J Mech Vent 2025; 6(2):72-78.

Metrics

659 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Mechanical power (MP) incorporates all the variables participating in ventilator-induced lung injury, such as driving pressure (DP), tidal volume, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), and respiratory rate (RR), to accurately represents the energy delivered by a mechanical ventilator onto the lungs. Several equations have attempted to simplify the mathematical complexity of calculating MP, one of which being the minute ventilation – mean airway pressure (mM) equation. Although the mM equation is mathematically simple with high accuracy and validity for calculating MP in passive situations, there is no evidence of its accuracy in spontaneous breathing patients. This study assesses the clinical utility of the mM equation on mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing efforts.

Methods and Statistics

This study utilized the online SIVA simulator to create different ventilation scenarios with various combinations of  compliances (10-80 mL/cmH2O) and resistances (5-30 cmH2O/L/s), with various flow and volume rates in the volume controlled (VCV) mode and inspiratory pressures and times in the pressure controlled (PCV) mode. Ventilator variables were manipulated to stimulate different ventilatory scenarios, including respiratory rate (5 – 40 BPM), tidal volume (150 – 700 mL), PEEP (0 – 15 cmH2O), and DP (5 – 30 cmH2O). The variable Pmus was manipulated to demonstrate changes in spontaneous breathing effort (1-20 cmH2O).

Over 30 different combinations of resistances and compliances with 100 different ventilatory settings were created (1500 in each of the two modes). The gold standard method of geometrically deriving the area under the Pressure-Volume curve was used to calculate MP with the SIVA simulator (range 0.1 – 105 J/min). The mM equation calculated from correspondent values of the mean airway pressure and minute ventilation using the SIVA simulator (range 0.37 – 820 cmH2O/L/min).

Results

Pearson correlation showed a very strong correlation between mM and ventilator power (R 0.969), very strong correlation between mM and total power (R 0.963), and strong correlation between mM and Pmus power (R 0.771) within PVC mode, with all demonstrating non-significant differences. Within VCV, Pearson correlation showed a very strong correlation between mM and ventilator power (R 0.963) and strong correlation between mM and total power (R 0.888), but weak correlation between mM and Pmus power (R 0.339).

Conclusion

 Mechanical power allows several significant ventilatory parameters to be unified into a single variable, serving as a simplified surrogate to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury. Many equations, including the recent mM equation, reliably calculate mechanical power in pressure-controlled ventilation compared to the gold standard method. However, there was a weak correlation of Pmus power in volume-controlled ventilation, suggesting spontaneous work of breathing of the patient may affect the reproducibility of the mM equation. Future research should explore alternative equations to accurately calculate mechanical power in spontaneous breathing.

Keywords: Mechanical power, mM equation, Pmus

References

1. Kumar A, Pontoppidan H, Falke KJ, et al. Pulmonary barotrauma during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 1973; 1(4):181-186.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-197307000-00001
PMid:4587509
2. Ak AK, Anjum F. Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Accessed April 17, 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563244/
3. Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, et al. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42(10):1567-1575.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2
PMid:27620287
4. Silva PL, Ball L, Rocco PRM, et al. Power to mechanical power to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury? Intensive Care Med Exp 2019;b7(Suppl 1):38.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0243-4
PMid:31346828 PMCid:PMC6658623
5. Serpa Neto A, Deliberato RO, Johnson AEW, et al. Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: an analysis of patients in two observational cohorts. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44(11):1914-1922.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5375-6
PMid:30291378
6. Becher T, van der Staay M. Calculation of mechanical power for pressure-controlled ventilation: author’s reply. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45(10):1498-1499.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05742-7
PMid:31432217
7. Brunner JX, Wysocki M. Is there an optimal breath pattern to minimize stress and strain during mechanical ventilation? Intensive Care Med 2009; 35(8):1479-1483.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1510-8
PMid:19543882
8. Caironi P, Langer T, Carlesso E, et al. Time to generate ventilator-induced lung injury among mammals with healthy lungs: a unifying hypothesis. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37(12):1913-1920.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2388-9
PMid:22052185
9. Trinkle CA, Broaddus RN, Sturgill JL, et al. Simple, accurate calculation of mechanical power in pressure controlled ventilation (PCV). Intensive Care Med Exp 2022;10(1):22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-022-00448-5
PMid:35644896 PMCid:PMC9148680
10. Giosa L, Busana M, Pasticci I, et al. Mechanical power at a glance: a simple surrogate for volume-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med Exp 2019; 7(1):61.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0276-8
PMid:31773328 PMCid:PMC6879677
11. Takaoka K, Toma S, Lee P, et al. A comparative analysis of mechanical power and Its components in pressure-controlled ventilation mode and AVM-2 mode. J Mech Vent 2023; 4(4):130-140.
https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10088
12. Iotti GA, Braschi A. Measurements of respiratory mechanics during mechanical ventilation. In Hamilton Medical Scientific Library, Rhäzüns, Switzerland 1999. Accessed May 2025.
13. Zheng H, Xu Z, Zhou J, et al. The accuracy of simplified calculation of mechanical power: a simulation study. J Thorac Dis 2023; 15(6):3237-3244.
https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1409
PMid:37426144 PMCid:PMC10323543
14. Daoud E, Lee P, Toma S, et al. Mean airway pressure – Minute ventilation product (mM): A simple and universal surrogate equation to calculate mechanical power in both volume and pressure controlled ventilation. J Mech Vent 2024; 5(2):46-55.
https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10099
15. Bates JHT, Smith BJ. Ventilator-induced lung injury and lung mechanics. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6(19):378-378.
https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.06.29
PMid:30460252 PMCid:PMC6212358
16. Zhou Y, Holets SR, Li M, et al. Etiology, incidence, and outcomes of patient-ventilator asynchrony in critically-ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1):12390.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90013-z
PMid:34117278 PMCid:PMC8196026
17. Zagales R, Lee P, Kumar S, et al. Optimizing management of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill surgical patients: A systematic review. J Surg Res 2025; 305:385-397.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.039
PMid:39755005
18. Espat NN, Lee P, Baum S, et al. Optimizing early surgical sepsis management in the emergency department: Risk factors, early detection, and management: A scoping review. Am J Emerg Med 2025; 95:133-139.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.048
PMid:40450949
19. Azizi BA, Munoz-Acuna R, Suleiman A, et al. Mechanical power and 30-day mortality in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients with and without Coronavirus Disease-2019: a hospital registry study. J Intensive Care 2023; 11(1):14.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00662-7
PMid:37024938 PMCid:PMC10077655
20. Aşar S, Acicbe Ö, Çukurova Z, et al. Bedside dynamic calculation of mechanical power: A validation study. J Crit Care 2020; 56:167-170.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.027
PMid:31931417
21. Yan Y, Xie Y, Chen X, et al. Mechanical power is associated with weaning outcome in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Sci Rep 2022;12(1):19634.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21609-2
PMid:36385129 PMCid:PMC9669041
22. Ghiani A, Walcher S, Lutfi A, et al. Mechanical power density, spontaneous breathing indexes, and weaning readiness following prolonged mechanical ventilation. Respir Med 2025;237:107943.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107943
PMid:39788438
23. Pistillo N, Castelluccio P, Suzuki I, et l. Mechanical power correlates with stress, strain, and atelectrauma only when normalized to aerated lung size in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Explor 2023;5(10):e0982.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000982
PMid:37753234 PMCid:PMC10519489