Effect of Trendelenburg position during prone ventilation in fifteen COVID-19 patients. Observational study

Marissa Su ,Kimiyo Yamasaki, Ehab G. Daoud

Abstract

Background

Prone position ventilation has shown to improve oxygenation and mortality in severe ARDS. The data of prone position ventilation during severe ARDS secondary to COVID-19 have shown similar benefit in oxygenation and mortality. Usually, patient placed in prone position are placed flat or in reverse Trendelenburg positioning to decrease risk of aspiration and abdominal girth compressing the chest. To date, no studies are available to compare the effects of positioning the bed in different angles during the prone position ventilation.

Methods

An observational study in fifteen patients with severe ARDS secondary to COVID-19 who were placed in the prone position for the first time. All the patients were sedated and chemically paralyzed with no spontaneous effort. All patients were ventilated with the pressure-controlled mode with set PEEP according to the pressure-volume curves. Five patients had esophageal balloon manometry to estimate pleural pressures and trans-pulmonary pressures. Patients were initially placed in reverse Trendelenburg position and later in Trendelenburg position. Tidal volume and respiratory compliance were observed for 30 minutes after bed positioning has been achieved. Tidal volume and total respiratory compliance in both Trendelenburg and reverse Trendelenburg position were compared. Ventilator settings were not changed during the observation.

No patients were suspected of increased intra-cranial or intra-ocular pressures. T-test was done to compare the values.

Results

Tidal volume significantly increased by 80.26 ± 23.4 ml/breath (95% CI 37.7 – 122.9) from 391.3 ± 52.7 to 471.6 ± 60.9 (20.5%) P 0.001. The respiratory system compliance significantly increased by 4.9 ml/cmH₂O (95% CI 1.4 – 8.4) from 34.6 ± 4.7 to 39.5 ± 4.6 (14%) P 0.001. Of the five patients with esophageal balloon, the lung compliance significantly increased by 16.7 ml/cmH₂O (95% CI 12.8 – 20.6) from 66.6 ± 1.7 to 83.3 ± 3.3 (25%) P 0.001. The chest wall compliance had small but non-significant increase by 1.5 ml/cmH₂O (95% CI -1.3 – 4.3) from 65 ± 1.4 to 66.5 ± 2.3 (2%) P 0.085.

Conclusion

In this study, statistically significant increase in tidal volume, lung and respiratory system compliance were observed in patients placed in the Trendelenburg position during prone position ventilation. The results reflect the effect of body positioning during prone position ventilation. These effects may be the reflection of altered ventilation distribution throughout the lungs and change in pleural pressure as well as trans-pulmonary pressure during body positioning. More studies need to be done to confirm and examine this phenomenon. Precautions should be taken as this maneuver can increase the intra-cranial and intra-ocular pressures.

Keywords

COVID-19, Trendelenburg, Reverse Trendelenburg, ARDS

References

1. Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al; PROSEVA study group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013; 368(23):2159-2168. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1214103 PMid:23688302

2. Guérin C, Albert RK, Beitler J, et al. Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:2385-2396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06306-w PMid:33169218 PMCid:PMC7652705

3. Shelhamer MC, Wesson PD, Solari IL, et al. Prone positioning in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19: A Cohort Study and Analysis of Physiology. J Intensive Care Med 2021; 36(2):241-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066620980399 PMid:33380236 PMCid:PMC7780273

4. Gleissman H, Forsgren A, Andersson E, et al. Prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and coronavirus disease 2019. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2021; 65(3):360-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13741 PMid:33165936 PMCid:PMC7894343

5. Coppo A, Bellani G, Winterton D, et al. Feasibility and physiological effects of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (PRON-COVID): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8(8):765-774. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30268-X

6. Mezidi M, Guérin C. Effects of patient positioning on respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6(19):384. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.05.50 PMid:30460258 PMCid:PMC6212360

7. Niël-Weise BS, Gastmeier P, Kola A et al. An evidence-based recommendation on bed head elevation for mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 2011; 15, R111. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10135 PMid:21481251 PMCid:PMC3219392

8. Robak O, Schellongowski P, Bojic A, et al. Short-term effects of combining upright and prone positions in patients with ARDS: a prospective randomized study. Crit Care 2011; 15(5):R230. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10471 PMid:21955757 PMCid:PMC3334777

9. Shokry M, Yamasaki K, Daoud EG. Can you calculate the total respiratory, lung, and chest wall respiratory mechanics? J Mech Vent 2020; 1(1):24-26. https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10007

10. Johnson NJ, Luks AM, Glenny RW. Gas Exchange in the Prone Posture. Respir Care 2017; 62(8):1097-1110. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05512 PMid:28559471

11. Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Arabi YM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Crit Care Med 2020; 48(6):e440-e469. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004363 PMid:32224769 PMCid:PMC7176264

12. Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Caironi P, et al. COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes? Intensive Care Med 2020; 46(6):1099-1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06033-2 PMid:32291463 PMCid:PMC7154064

13. Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Rossi S. COVID-19 pneumonia: ARDS or not? Crit Care 2020; 24:154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02880-z PMid:32299472 PMCid:PMC7160817

14. Weiss TT, Cerda F, Scott JB, et al. Prone positioning for patients intubated for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID‑19: A retrospective observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth 2021; 126:48‑55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.042 PMid:33158500 PMCid:PMC7547633

15. Langer T, Brioni M, Guzzardella A, et al. Prone position in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID‑19: A multi‑centric study of more than 1000 patients. Crit Care 2021; 25:128.  DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03552-2 PMID: 33823862 PMCID: PMC8022297

16. Mathews KS, Soh H, Shaefi S, et al. Prone positioning and survival in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019-related respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2021; 49(7):1026-1037. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004938 PMid:33595960 PMCid:PMC8277560

17. Ukere A, März A, Wodack KH, et al. Perioperative assessment of regional ventilation during changing body positions and ventilation conditions by electrical impedance tomography. Br J Anaesth 2016; 117(2):228-235. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew188 PMid:27440635

18. Robak O, Schellongowski P, Bojic A, et al. Short-term effects of combining upright and prone positions in patients with ARDS: a prospective randomized study. Crit Care 2011; 15(5):R230. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10471 PMid:21955757 PMCid:PMC3334777

19. Park J, Lee HY, Lee J, et al. Effect of prone positioning on oxygenation and static respiratory system compliance in COVID-19 ARDS vs. non-COVID ARDS. Respir Res 2021; 22(1):220. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01819-4 PMid:34362368 PMCid:PMC8343350

20. Galvin I, Drummond GB, Nirmalan M. Distribution of blood flow and ventilation in the lung: gravity is not the only factor. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98(4):420-428. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem036 PMid:17347182

21. Gattinoni L, Taccone P, Carlesso E, et al. Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Rationale, indications, and limits. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188(11):1286-1293. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201308-1532CI PMid:24134414

22. Iotti GA, Braschi A. Measurements of respiratory mechanics during mechanical ventilation, Hamilton Medical Scientific Library, Rhazuns, Switzerland (1999) 66-82. Hamiltonmedical.nl.

23. Kotani T, Hanaoka M, Hirahara S, et al. Regional overdistension during prone positioning in a patient with acute respiratory failure who was ventilated with a low tidal volume: a case report. J Intensive Care 2018; 14;6:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0290-z PMid:29564137 PMCid:PMC5853159

24. Albashir AAD. The potential impacts of obesity on COVID-19. Clin Med 2020; 20(4):e109-e113. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2020-0239 PMid:32571783 PMCid:PMC7385759

25. Chiumello D, Froio S, Bouhemad B, et al. Clinical review: Lung imaging in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients–an update. Crit Care 2013; 17(6):243. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13114 PMid:24238477 PMCid:PMC4056355

26. Simonpietri M, Shokry M, Daoud EG. Electrical Impedance Tomography: the future of mechanical ventilation? J Mech Vent 2021; 2(2):64-70. https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10024

27. Usemann J, Yammine S, Singer F, et al. Inert gas washout: background and application in various lung diseases. Swiss Med Wkly 2017; 16;147:w14483. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2017.14483 PMid:28871575

28. Ozcan MS, Praetel C, Bhatti MT, et al. The effect of body inclination during prone positioning on intraocular pressure in awake volunteers: a comparison of two operating tables. Anesth Analg 2004; 99(4):1152-1158. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000130851.37039.50 PMid:15385367

29. Robba C, Cardim D, Donnelly J, et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on intracranial pressure assessed using different non-invasive methods. Br J Anaesth 2016; 117(6):783-791. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew356 PMid:27956677