Towards optimal Patient-Ventilator Interaction: The interacting signals

Ahmed S. ElMasry

Abstract

Background

Patient-ventilator interaction (PVI) emerges from the continuous interaction between physiological signals generated by the patient and signals generated, measured, or displayed by the mechanical ventilator. Traditionally, PVI has been described predominantly through recognizable forms of patient-ventilator asynchrony. Although this approach remains clinically useful, the visible waveform abnormalities represent the final expression of interactions occurring between multiple neural, muscular, mechanical and ventilator signals.

Methods

This conceptual narrative review builds on contemporary PVI taxonomies by organizing bedside analysis around the relationships between selected patient and ventilator signals. Patient-derived physiological signals may reflect neural respiratory activity, respiratory muscle activation, and respiratory muscle pressure, whereas ventilator-derived signals include mechanical breath onset, assistance delivery, cycling-off, and ventilator-measured airway pressure, flow and volume.

Rather than introducing new PVI categories, the framework uses four sequential relational questions: whether expected patient and ventilator signals correspond; whether their inspiratory onsets are appropriately aligned; whether their inspiratory offsets are appropriately aligned; and whether the magnitude of ventilator-delivered assistance is appropriate for the intended physiological target. Loss of expected correspondence produces abnormalities such as failed triggering and unintended (false) triggering. Abnormal temporal relationships between corresponding inspiratory onsets produce early or late triggering, whereas abnormal offset relationships produce early or late cycling. Appropriate timing, however, does not guarantee appropriate assistance: under-assistance and over-assistance represent abnormalities in the magnitude of ventilator contribution relative to patient respiratory demand and the intended unloading goal.

The same signal-identification approach is applied across the expiratory phase, where active expiratory muscle contraction, expiratory-flow deformation, persistence of inspiratory activity after cycling-off, and expiratory muscle relaxation may alter waveform appearance and influence subsequent triggering. Directionality is treated as an interpretive modifier when temporal sequence alone is insufficient to establish the underlying mechanism. Reverse triggering illustrates this distinction, demonstrating that the interaction may proceed from the ventilator to the patient rather than from the patient to the ventilator.

Conclusions

A stepwise bedside algorithm is proposed to translate this signal-based framework into practical waveform interpretation. Understanding which signals are interacting, how they correspond, how their timing and magnitude relate, and how interactions propagate across respiratory phases provides a physiological path toward more precise interpretation of PVI and ultimately towards optimal patient-ventilator interaction.

Keywords: Patient-Ventilator Interaction, Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony, Respiratory Signals, Mechanical Ventilation.

References

1. Mireles-Cabodevila E, Vaporidi K, Blanch L, et al. Defining and measuring patient-ventilator interactions: 10 fundamental maxims. Respir Care 2026; 71(6):601-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/19433654261425219 PMid:41913371  2. Mireles-Cabodevila E, Siuba MT, Chatburn RL. A taxonomy for patient-ventilator interactions and a method to read ventilator waveforms. Respir Care 2022; 67(1):129-148. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.09316 PMid:34470804  3. Tonelli R, Protti A, Spinelli E, et al. Assessing inspiratory drive and effort in critically ill patients at the bedside. Crit Care. 2025; 29:339. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05526-0 PMid:40745324 PMCid:PMC12315345  4. Mojoli F, Pozzi M, Orlando A, et al. Timing of inspiratory muscle activity detected from airway pressure and flow during pressure support ventilation: the waveform method. Crit Care 2022;26:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03895-4 PMid:35094707 PMCid:PMC8802480  5. Gilstrap D, MacIntyre N. Patient-ventilator interactions: implications for clinical management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188:1058-1068. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201212-2214CI PMid:24070493  6. de Wit M. Monitoring of patient-ventilator interaction at the bedside. Respir Care 2011; 56:61-72. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01077 PMid:21235839  7. Dres M, Rittayamai N, Brochard L. Monitoring patient-ventilator asynchrony. Curr Opin Crit Care 2016; 22:246-253. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000307 PMid:27070802  8. Subira C, de Haro C, Magrans R, et al. Minimizing asynchronies in mechanical ventilation: current and future trends. Respir Care 2018; 63:464-478. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05949 PMid:29487094  9. Holanda MA, Vasconcelos RDS, Ferreira JC, Pinheiro BV. Patient-ventilator asynchrony. J Bras Pneumol 2018; 44:321-333. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-37562017000000185 PMid:30020347  10. Mirabella L, Cinnella G, Costa R, et al. Patient-ventilator asynchronies: clinical implications and practical solutions. Respir Care 2020; 65:1751-1766. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.07284 PMid:32665426  11. Hill LL, Pearl RG. Ventilator triggering. Anesthesiol Clin 2019; 37:475-492.  12. Tassaux D, Gainnier M, Battisti A, et al. Impact of expiratory trigger setting on delayed cycling and inspiratory muscle workload. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 172:1283-1289. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200407-880OC PMid:16109983  13. Spahija J, de Marchie M, Albert M, et al. Patient-ventilator interaction during pressure support ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:518-526. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0d7b PMid:20083921  14. Pozzi M, Mojoli F, Orlando A, et al. Pressure support, patient effort and tidal volume: a conceptual model for a nonlinear interaction. Ann Intensive Care 2024; 14:166.  15. Akoumianaki E, Vaporidi K, Stamatopoulou V, et al. Gastric pressure monitoring unveils abnormal patient-ventilator interaction related to active expiration: a retrospective observational study. Anesthesiology 2024; 141(3):541-553. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005071 PMid:38753985  16. Goligher EC, Dres M, Patel BK, et al. Lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202(7):950-961. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202003-0655CP PMid:32516052 PMCid:PMC7710325  17. Hu J, Hasan O, Shiraishi K, et al. Comparison of estimation of inspiratory muscle effort using three common indices in various respiratory models, a bench study. J Mech Vent 2024; 5(4):119-125. https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10111  18. Perez V, Pasco J. Identifying asynchronies: Expiratory work. J Mech Vent 2023; 4(3):125-128. https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10086  19. Jonkman AH, Holleboom MC, de Vries HJ, et al. Expiratory muscle relaxation-induced ventilator triggering: A novel patient-ventilator dyssynchrony. Chest 2022; 161(6):e337-e341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.070 PMid:35680312 PMCid:PMC9248081  20. Gallardo A, Sayat MC, Silvero A, et al. Classifying Reverse Triggering breaths: A clinically oriented approach. J Mech Vent 2025; 6(4):201-207. https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10141