Comparison of Cuff Leak Test, Laryngeal Ultrasonography, and Videolaryngoscopy for the prediction of post-extubation stridor

Rubina Khullar Mahajan, Apoorva Gupta, Parshotam Lal Gautam, Gunchan Paul, Vikalp Khatri

Cite

Mahajan RK, Gupta A, Gautam PL, Paul G, Khatri V.  Comparison of Cuff Leak Test, Laryngeal Ultrasonography, and Videolaryngoscopy for the prediction of post-extubation stridor. J Mech Vent 2025; 6(2):53-63.

Metrics

1511 Downloads

Abstract

Background and Aims

Post-extubation stridor (PES) leading to reintubation is a frequent complication of endotracheal intubation. This study was done to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of the cuff leak test (CLT), laryngeal ultrasound (LUS), and videolaryngoscopy (VL) for the prediction of PES.

Material and Methods

This prospective, observational study was conducted on 80 adult patients intubated for at least 24 hours. Within 6 hours before extubation, CLT and LUS were done, with the endotracheal tube cuff inflated and deflated. Cuff leak volume (CLV), leak volume fraction ratio (LVFR), and airway column width difference (ACWD) were noted. The grade of peri-laryngeal edema was noted with VL. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

After extubation, patients were divided into two groups: PES (n=23, 28.8%) and non-PES (n=57, 71.25%). Reintubation rate was 100%, for those with PES, whereas the was no reintubation in those with no PES. CLV <245 ml predicted the possibility of PES (p=0.001) with a sensitivity 91.3%, negative predictive value (NPV) 95.65%, specificity 77.19%, positive predictive value (PPV) 61.76%, and accuracy 81.25%. LVFR <28% predicted PES (p=0.001) with a sensitivity 65.22%, specificity 94.74%, PPV 83.3%, NPV 87.1%, accuracy 86.25%. ACWD <0.45 mm (p<0.003) predicted chances of PES with sensitivity 56.2%, specificity 78.95%, PPV 52%, NPV 81.82%, and accuracy 72.5%. VL scale >2 predicted a significantly higher (p=0.001) risk of PES, (sensitivity 52.1%, specificity 92.98%, PPV 75%, NPV 82.81%, accuracy 81.25%).

Conclusions

An algorithmic approach should be adopted. All patients should undergo CLT before extubation. For patients with positive CLT, LVFR and videolaryngoscopy assessment should be done.  ACWD should be used only in combination with other parameters.

Keywords: Cuff-leak, laryngeal ultrasound, videolaryngoscopy, post-extubation, stridor

References

1. Kuriyama A, Jackson JL, Kamei J. Performance of the cuff leak test in adults in predicting post-extubation airway complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2020; 24:640.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03358-8
PMid:33160405 PMCid:PMC7648377
2. Tanaka A, Uchiyama A, Horiguchi Y, et al. Predictors of post-extubation stridor in patients on mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study. Sci Rep 2021; 11:19993.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99501-8
PMid:34620954 PMCid:PMC8497593
3. De Backer D. The cuff-leak test: what are we measuring? Crit Care 2005; 9:31-33.
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3031
PMid:15693980 PMCid:PMC1065116
4. Schnell D, Planquette B, Berger A, et al. Cuff leak test for the diagnosis of post-extubation stridor: A multicenter evaluation study. J Intensive Care Med 2019; 34:391-396.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066617700095
PMid:28343416
5. Zhou T, Zhang HP, Chen WW, et al. Cuff-leak test for predicting postextubation airway complications: A systematic review. J Evid Based Med 2011; 4:242-254.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-5391.2011.01160.x
PMid:23672755
6. Ochoa ME, Marín M del C, Frutos-Vivar F, et al. Cuff-leak test for the diagnosis of upper airway obstruction in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:1171-1179.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1501-9
PMid:19399474
7. Pluijms WA, van Mook WN, Wittekamp BH, et al. Post extubation laryngeal edema and stridor resulting in respiratory failure in critically ill adult patients: updated review. Crit Care 2015; 19:295.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1018-2
PMid:26395175 PMCid:PMC4580147
8. Kriner EJ, Shafazand S, Colice GL. The endotracheal tube cuff-leak test as a predictor for postextubation stridor. Respir Care 2005; 50:1632-638.
9. Miller RL, Cole RP. Association between reduced cuff leak volume and post extubation stridor. Chest 1996; 110:1035-1040.
https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.110.4.1035
PMid:8874265
10. Ding LW, Wang HC, Wu HD, et al. Laryngeal ultrasound: a useful method in predicting post-extubation stridor. A pilot study. Eur Respir J 2006; 27:384-389.
https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.06.00029605
PMid:16452597
11. Sutherasan Y, Theerawit P, Hongphanut T, et al. Predicting laryngeal edema in intubated patients by portable intensive care unit ultrasound. J Crit Care 2013; 28:675-680.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.05.011
PMid:23806246
12. Adi O, Sum KM, Ahmad AH, et al. Novel role of focused airway ultrasound in early airway assessment of suspected laryngeal trauma. Ultrasound J 2020; 12:37.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-020-00186-3
PMid:32783133 PMCid:PMC7419387
13. Zytoun T, Noeman Y, Abdelhady M, et al. The role of laryngeal ultrasound in predicting postextubation laryngeal edema. Res Opin Anesth Intensive Care 2019; 6:294.
https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_48_18
14. Venkategowda PM, Mahendrakar K, Rao SM, et al. Laryngeal air column width ratio in predicting post extubation stridor. Indian J Crit Care Med 2015; 19:170-173.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.152763
PMid:25810614 PMCid:PMC4366917
15. Tsai WW, Hung KC, Huang YT, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of sonographic measurement of laryngeal air column width difference for predicting the risk of post-extubation stridor: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1109681.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1109681
PMid:36744149 PMCid:PMC9893004
16. Elsayed AA, Mansour M, Ali TM. Laryngeal air column width ratio in predicting postextubation stridor. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 2021; 114:hcab087.002.
https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcab087.002
17. El-Abdeen Mohammed, Ashraf Z, Shaaban Lamiaa H, et al. Laryngeal ultrasound as a bedside tool in detecting post extubation stridor in patients with respiratory illness. Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice 2000; 5(1):36-40.
https://doi.org/10.4103/JCMRP.JCMRP_97_18
18. Ak AK, Cascella M. Post-Intubation laryngeal edema. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island (FL); 2023.
19. Newmark JL, Ahn YK, Adams MC, et al. Use of video laryngoscopy and camera phones to communicate progression of laryngeal edema in assessing for extubation: a case series. J Intensive Care Med 2013; 28: 67-71.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066612437528
PMid:22337710
20. Lemyze M, Durville E, Meddour M, et al. Impact of fiber-optic laryngoscopy on the weaning process from mechanical ventilation in high-risk patients for postextubation stridor. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e5971.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005971
PMid:28151886 PMCid:PMC5293449
21. Shaikh F, Janaapureddy YR, Mohanty S, et al. Utility of endotracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring in mechanically ventilated (mv) children in preventing post-extubation stridor (PES). Indian J Crit Care Med 2021; 25:181-184.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23737
PMid:33707897 PMCid:PMC7922465
22. Salzarulo HH, Taylor LA. Diabetic “Stiff Joint Syndrome” as a Cause of Difficult Endotracheal Intubation. Anesthesiology 1986; 64:366-367.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198603000-00012
PMid:3954133
23. El-Baradey GF, El-Shmaa NS, Elsharawy F. Ultrasound-guided laryngeal air column width difference and the cuff leak volume in predicting the effectiveness of steroid therapy on post extubation stridor in adult. Are they useful? J Crit Care 2016; 36:272-276.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.07.007
PMid:27468680
24. Hasan A, Ahmed F. Predictive value of cuff leak test, laryngeal ultrasound, and fiberoptic laryngoscopy for post extubation stridor after prolonged intubation. Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care 2019, 6:355-355.
https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_76_18
25. Sahar M, Moien M, Abdalla W, et al. Laryngeal ultrasound versus cuff leak test in prediction of post extubation laryngeal edema. Nature and Science 2019; 17:104-112.
26. Mikaeili H, Yazdchi M, Tarzamni MK, et al. Laryngeal ultrasonography versus cuff leak test in predicting post extubation stridor. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2014; 6:25-28.
27. Sahbal MA, Mohamed KA, Zaghla HH, et al. Laryngeal ultrasound versus cuff leak test in prediction of post-extubation stridor. The Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine 2017; 5:83-86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejccm.2017.10.002
28. Chenkin J, McCartney CJL, Jelic T, et al. Defining the learning curve of point-of-care ultrasound for confirming endotracheal tube placement by emergency physicians. Crit Ultrasound J 2015; 7:14.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-015-0031-7
PMid:26383011 PMCid:PMC4573959
29. Alhomary M, Ramadan E, Curran E, et al. Videolaryngoscopy vs. fibreoptic bronchoscopy for awake tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2018; 73:1151-1161.
https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14299
PMid:29687891